Keane Lim
WRIT 1133
Professor Eric Leake
4 April 2013
Food Culture and Values From a Producer's Perspective
Companies
create advertisements in order to draw people to buy their products; however,
the people they target, the audience, and how they do so is what makes the
difference when analyzing food advertising. There is a fallacy in how companies
morph their material towards their demographic because the producer bases it
off of how they perceive the audience
will react. Thus, with every advertisement, there will be a broad
generalization -- a blanket statement made off the assumptions of the market on
what they think matters to us consumers in terms of food culture and values.
Take, for example, these three food advertisements:
The
endorser of the first advertisement is McDonald's, a prominent fast food joint
even today. The design craftily uses a black background in order to make the
McDonald's more appealing to the eye while also drawing attention to the focal
point of the advertisement, the picture. From the picture, it can be assumed
that the audience are for families or family-oriented people since there is a
happy family enjoying a meal at McDonald's. Implicitly, this also pegs the
emotion of "being happy" to going to McDonald's, which is why all the
actors in the picture are caught smiling. McDonald's also puts the youngest child
in the very middle of the picture to appeal to parents who have youngsters and
to project that even small kids will be pleased by their meal, later reaffirmed
by the line "the kids love it." Below, there is supplementary
advertising, secondary to the brightly colored picture above. The font is
smaller but the bold letters draw the reader in.
Analysis
of the rhetorical function begins with the use of the imperative "Do your
dinnertimin' at McDonald's." The phrase is suggestive and literally
commands the reader to the act of "doing" and in bold letters to
increase a sense of urgency and importance. The next line talks about a
"different place to have dinner" which imploys the same strategies
read in Freedman and Jurafsky about wanting to appear unique and not as generic
as other places for dinner. The advertisement ends with "We do it all for
you" making the customer believe that McDonald's is doing them a favor,
giving them an idea that they should feel special and that since McDonald's is
doing something for them, they should reciprocate with by fulfilling a favor of
their own (i.e. buy their food).
In
the second advertisement, the use of iconic Aunt Jemima brings customers in by
history. Other products with Aunt Jemima's face have set the stage of familiarity
for the customer so that will feel more inclined to buy a product that they
have had a previous connection with before. Like in the previous advertisement,
the models with their smiling faces, tie the idea of happiness to the product,
which makes the person more inclined to buy the product because "Happy
days is here!" This is seen again in the third advertisement with Aunt
Jemima where there is repetitive use of happy associated adjectives like cheer,
fluffy, and energizing. Based on the design, the audience appears to be
African-American and Caucasian demographics. I would assume that there was more
emphasis on the white population due to using a white boy as a model for the
satisfied customer eating his pancakes. The dialogue in the advertisements also
appeals to southerners with their archetypal way of speaking used to make the
customers feel more connected to the product. The Aunt Jemima ad also cleverly
underlines "secret recipe," appealing to human's natural instinct of
curiosity in knowing what that secret is - by buying it - or in another
argument, the secret is being shared to you so you feel special about knowing
it. Lastly, the rhetorical function of the Jemima ad is when it talks about
"Folks sho' cheer.." creating a standard in the customer's mind that
other "folks" approve of the pancake mix, so why shouldn't they too?
Based
upon the persuasion techniques used in advertisements, McDonald's sees food
culture in terms of family and casual dining. McDonald's tries to frame their
place as a casual environment that kids would enjoy. Their reference to no tips
and no getting dressed up say a lot about food culture and the uptight and
expensive stigma that other restaurants get. The particular use of words like
"relax" and "get down" reflect this value that McDonald's
is targetting. It also talks about the value of convenience and appeals to
people who do not want to wait for their food. The Aunt Jemima advertisement
also seems to draw that food culture revolves around the family aspect. The name
Aunt Jemima alone creates a sort of pseudo-family between the consumer and
producer, where people should feel inclined to buy products because of her
being the proclaimed "aunt" in this relationship. The marketing
campaign in both share the thinking that customers are more lazy such as with
the Jemima ad about the product being readily mixed and McDonald's promising
"food that won't keep you waitin'."
An
important omission when discussing the food culture and values that the
companies assume about society is context. Both advertisements are outdated and
so, it is important to understand that food culture and values can only be
gleaned accurately when taking into consideration the context that they came
from. These observations do not reflect what food culture and values are
assumed to be in modern day. This brings up the additional point that food
culture and values in society are dynamically changing all the time. For these
three advertisements, the most noticeable rhetorical function was the
vernacular. In the McDonald's ad, words like Dinnertimin' and other words where
the "g" was dropped, appealed to the working class and perhaps less
educated people where colloquialisms were favored over proper speech. Since the
models in the picture were all black, this use of vernacular similarly seen in
books like To Kill a Mockingbird or Their Eyes Were Watching God all
appealed to the African-American population as their audience by trying to
connect with them on a more personal level by incorporating the idiosyncracies
of how they talk in their advertisements. This was already touched upon in the
Aunt Jemima ads, where the vernacular is nostalgic of the South but moreso
ethnocentric on African-American southerners given Aunt Jemima as the
African-American figure head. The most important aspect of food culture and
values in advertising is how relatable the companies can make themselves appear
to the common layman, which was seen in these advertisements.
Food
culture and values are a very interesting topic to investigate because of the
approaches marketing campaigns use in targetting them. For the value of family,
there will be pictures of happy families or focus on what little kids would
like in order to influence the parents who usually make the call on where to
eat. Another aspect of food culture seen in the advertisements is how markets
realize that it is more about appealing to the audience as opposed to creating
a more superior product. They find distinguishing characteristics about that
demographic (which are often stereotypical) and incorporate it in their ads to
increase relatability between consumer and producer. This is because markets
know that customers are more likely to buy from people that are "like
them," so food cultures and values from a producer's perspective is
determining what these defining traits are.
I
choose race for this analysis along with more vintage advertisements because
societal expectations were relatively defined for the black population. Had it
been a white audience, the subtext and design of the advertisements would be
vastly different to conform to what markets believe a white person is like and
values. In modern day, the difference has shifted to the different expectations
for gender with regard to food. What men are perceived to see in food is
different than what women want and that leads to the diversity in advertising. It
is important to exercise critical analysis that these projections on
advertisements are only approximations of what a market believes of an audience
rather than evident truths.
2 comments:
-You analyze the rhetorical functions well, such as the language used in the ads and how the people were depicted, I agree for the most part.
-I thought your observation on the culture was quite good, about how they both relate food to families and that they need to appeal to the audience rather than make good food.
-To complicate it more, I do think that they need to make better food than most other competition, even if you have a great ad but terrible food, people won't come. It has to be somewhat decent.
-I did see some grammar errors, so revising would be good, very good though.
1. In what ways does the author analyze the rhetorical functions of the advertisements, and do you agree with this analysis?
Keane analyzes the advertisement using human values and emotions. Looking to how humans are driven by pleasure, and then showing how the advertisements depict the pleasure to the audience in order to gain customers is quite effective. Keane noted the racial, gender and age in which both those in the ads as wells as the audience is, which is important.
2. What observation about food values and cultures does the author make based upon that analysis?
Keane observed that connecting to the food on a personal level was important. Family values draw in consumers as well implying family through a historical image, images of family eating together or implying that the food is an old family recipe. Keane also depicts that different communities have different values that advertisers tend to stereotype on.
3. How might you add to or complicate this observation about food values and cultures?
I would add an advertisement that is current. Keane attempted to compare these past ads to our modern society but I feel that this could have been done better had he had a third example to work off of.
4. Any other questions or suggestions for revision?
This was a really interesting essay and I thought it was well structured. Adding different elements such as age and race and different time periods was interesting but again to relate more to our current issues I would have brought modern society up more in comparison to an already well analyzed rhetoric.
Post a Comment